Work continues on the truck, now known as Six Shooter. I might have already mentioned that in a previous post but going forward it will be the standard reference. Six Shooter also has its own web site, The plan there is to put a bluetooth beacon in the truck, especially at car shows, so that people can go to the web site to learn more about the vehicle.

freshly powder coated K-Member from a 1963 Chevy C10

The most recent progress is the installation of Performance Online (POL) suspension upgrade parts. A few months ago a friend came over and we stripped off the original front suspension, all the way down to the k-member. The k-member went to Powder Coat It Santa Cruz where it got dipped in a degreasing hot tub, media blasted and powder coated semi-gloss black. I order new parts from Performance Online, everything from the k-member out; tubular upper and lower control arms, tie rods, springs, spindles, and disc brakes. Also replacing all of the steering parts; manual steering box (yes, sticking with manual steering for now), pitman arm, and idler arm. Brandon at Performance Online was extremely helpful. Made sure I got exactly what I needed for the build. The only item not replaced in the steering is the center link. It is in good shape so it will go to Powder Coat It to get blasted and powder coated.

Installation of the new parts was relatively easy and went fairly quickly. Performance Online is pretty skimpy on the documentation but I cannot say that it really caused any problems. We bolted the k-member to the frame using new grade 8 bolts and nuts. Next the upper tubular control arms went on. I reused the original spacers when installing the upper control arms but I wish I had purchased POL’s Camber Correction Kit with the rest of the parts. I will probably purchase it and make the switch. The upper control arm ball joints bolted into place without issue.

Tubular lower control arm on a 1963 Chevy C10

The lower tubular control arms went on next. I purchased new U bolts from POL. Once the U bolts were tight enough to hold the cross shaft securely, we noticed that one side moved up and down fairly freely while the other side was pretty hard to move. It could still be moved by hand but the harder one took a fair amount of effort. A big plus, POL had already pressed the ball joints into place on the lower control arms. No need to find a press. Nice. We attached the spindle to the upper control arm ball joint threading the nut on to where the ball joint stud was just shy of flush with the top of the nut to give us as much room as possible to get the spring in.

1963 Chevy C10 driver side front suspension no tire

We borrowed a spring compressor from Auto Zone, the type that goes inside the spring with two hooks, a plate and a fine threaded rod. The hole in the lower control arm is rather small so it took a few minutes to figure out how to get the compressor out once it had served its purpose. It was necessary to fully disassemble the spring compressor in order to get it out. Yes, those hooks come off, too. The spring needs to be compressed pretty significantly in order to fit it in. Once the spring was in place, we lifted the lower control arm fitted the stud into the spindle, and threaded the nut. Then we tighten both upper and lower ball joint studs. It was necessary to completely unthread the rod from the compressor. Then pull the pins holding the hooks and remove all of the pieces individually through the hold in the lower control arm. Once we figured out the process — which we did before attempting to install the springs — it was pretty simple and straightforward.

Front suspension on 1963 Chevy C10, no front clip or engine

Lastly, I hung the anti-sway bar in place to see where the holes would need to be drilled. On my frame, there is one hole already in a perfect location. I only need to make a second hole for the mounting bracket. That second hole would best be right where a rivet is located which holds the radiator support in place. The current thought is to remove the rivet and use the existing hole to mount the anti-sway bar bracket. We shall see how that works out.

I still have steering parts to install. Before I can do that the center link needs to be blasted and powder coated. Six Shooter still needs a lot of work before he will be ready for first start. I would like to get to first start by the end of summer. We will see how much work gets done over the next 12 to 13 weeks.

Back in November of last year I introduced my latest project vehicle, a 1963 Chevrolet C10. At that time I had redone the gaskets, rebuilt the carburetor and pulled the gas tank to fix the filler neck. As is so often the case with project cars, a lot has happened since my last article but not much has changed.

1963 Chevrolet C10 Pickup Truck

While the gas tank was out I decided it was a good opportunity to address the condition of the floor pan and try to quiet the ride a little. This was supposed to be a quick weekend project after which I would get the truck back on the road and continue build the truck one weekend project at a time (stop laughing).

I wire brushed out all of the surface rust on the floor pan and bulkheads. Treated the areas that had rust with a product called SEM Rust-Seal and primered the entire floor and rear bulkhead. After some research I decided to use Second Skin Audio’s Spectrum spray on sound abatement product. Math is hard and I ended up buying too much. A gallon is plenty to shoot three coats on the floor pan of a single cab pickup truck. Email me if you need some, I have a lot left.

Prepping the floorboard for paint

At some point the driver side door finally stopped latching closed altogether. If the door will not stay closed, the vehicle is not really drivable. I am not red neck enough to tie the door shut with a rope, so I tore the door apart to replace the latch assembly. As long as I had the door apart and had to buy a lot of replacement parts anyway, might as well rebuild the door. This involves replacing all the weather strip, seals and gaskets. On these old vehicles that had wind wing vents, that ends up being a lot of work. And of course, you cannot just do one door, right?

During all this I was investigating the rebuild of the engine. I was originally planning to rebuild the engine myself. By that I mean, tear it down, send everything to the machine shop, buy a rebuild kit and put it all back together. For quality parts (ie, not purchased on eBay) and using the better machine shop in the area, rebuilding the engine would cost about $1800. So, what does a remanufactured engine cost. I came across the web site which claimed to have 250 CID 6 cylinder long blocks for $1191. Holy smokes! That is way cheaper than doing it myself and it comes with a 7 year, 100,000 mile warranty. Well, the starting price is $1191. There is a $250 core charge. Shipping is $150. So, the remanufactured engine will actually cost me $1500. Plus the extras I ended up putting on it.

When I started this project my intent was to build a bone stock ’60s era truck to use as a daily driver. But I decided that I also wanted to get good gas mileage, so I started looking at modifications that would improve mpg. At the end of the day, it turns out that most of the modifications that improve power and torque are the same improvements that improve mpg. At least to a certain extent.

Long story short, I have ordered Clifford’s dual carb intake manifold, 2 Weber 38 DGAS carburetors, and Clifford headers. Clifford claims this will increase horse power and torque by 100% and the dual carbs will improve gas mileage by 10 to 15 mpg. When I talked to the engine remanufacturer about what I was planning they suggested porting and polishing the head and putting in a mild Elgin cam. In summary, I will now be putting in a remanufactured engine with a mild Elgin cam, dual carbs and headers. I do plan to try to get it on a dyno and see what it makes at the rubber.

As I write this, the truck sits interior completely gutted, front clip sitting in a piece in the garage, the engine and transmission removed. The engine is on order and scheduled to arrive this week. The Clifford parts have been order and should arrive in a week or two. The transmission is out and going into the shop this week. I will be ordering a new clutch and putting the flywheel into the machine shop for resurfacing.

My son and I are currently in the middle of rewiring the truck using a Painless Rewiring Kit. We have the old wiring harness out and are starting to put in the new one. I hoping we have it finished by the end of Labor Day weekend. Once the rewire is finished, we will start putting the drive train back together. With luck and hard work, the Six Shooter will be back on the road before Thanksgiving.

Roadkill is a YouTube podcast by two guys who take sketchy, clapped out vehicles, do crazy modifications to them and then take ridiculous road trips to God knows where. They are the definition of the saying, “it is not the destination, it is the journey.” My son and I love this show.

Some time back my son bought a 1973 Chevy C10 pickup from a gentleman at my work. The truck ran but only just. I figured it would be a good learning experience for my son. Little did I know it would end up being our own Roadkill episode.

When we bought the truck it did not start well because the carburetor was in bad shape. It had a pretty bad exhaust leak and, although we did not know it at the time, it very likely had almost no compression on at least 2 cylinders.


My son had helped me rebuild the carburetor on my 1963 Chevy C10, which had the same engine with a carburetor from the same manufacturer. So, he bought a rebuild kit and rebuilt the carburetor. Not to brag too much but my son is one of the few guys his age that even knows what a carburetor, let alone how to rebuild and properly adjust one.

That left the exhaust leak. We decided to pull the head and the manifolds effectively doing a top end rebuild. At the time I really thought the truck was just going to get my son around town so we decided not to do a full engine rebuild. #RoadkillMoment

My son pulled the head, the manifolds, disassembled the valve train and got everything stripped down to parts and ready for the machine shop. We tried a couple of different shops before finding a decent place that would do a good job. Head and manifolds went in without incident and came back ready for reassembly.


We cleaned everything up and began reassembling the engine. It went back together well. My son learned a lot about engines in the process. After we got it back together we set timing and dwell and adjusted the carburetor. It was not running as well as I thought it should so I took it in to my auto mechanic and asked him to dial it in for me. I failed to close up all the vacuum leaks which was the primary reason it was not tuning up right. Once all the vacuum leaks were closed up and engine was tuned, it really ran pretty good.

About this time, my son landed an internship at a ranch in Montana. This would be a great opportunity to take his newly rebuilt truck on a road trip. A father and son adventure of a life time. I talked to my mechanic about it, he thought taking the truck on such a long trip with almost no break in after the rebuild was a bad idea. He does not watch Roadkill. We packed the truck and took off.

From Salinas, California to Big Sandy, Montana is 1350 miles, over Donner Pass in the Sierras and then over the continental divide. It is a long trip for any vehicle. The Rusty Bullet started out doing pretty well. It ran pretty smooth and held 65 to 70 without trouble. And got about 9 miles to the gallon. We climbed to the top of Donner Pass without much slow down for the grade, after a carburetor adjustment for altitude. At this point, I was really impressed with the old truck and my son’s work. I was pretty sure it was going to be a fun trip.

Roadkill trip to MT

As we descended through the Sierras the oil light came on. At first I figured it was probably a faulty wire or light but better safe than sorry. I pulled over to check the oil. The dip stick was bone dry. Nothing. Not a drop of oil anywhere on the stick. Well, that is a little worrisome. We drove to the next exit where, fortunately, there was a gas station that did indeed carry oil. I bought five quarts (because it appeared to be empty). The engine took three quarts to get to the appropriate point on the dip stick. We drove into Reno where I figured it might be a wise idea to buy a case of oil, just in case. I also checked the spark plugs to see if they were getting fouled by the oil that was leaking into the cylinder due to the dilapidated rings. Based on the condition of the plugs it appeared that cylinders 1 and 4 were the worst, 2 and 3 were better but still pretty bad and 5 and 6 were in pretty good shape.

Remember that RoadkillMoment tag at the end of paragraph five? Yeah, I should have had my son rebuild the bottom half, too.

About half way through the first day of driving the truck began to hesitate under acceleration at the top end. Adjustments seemed to help but the hesitations never went away completely. Day one ended with our fairly late arrival at what was scheduled to be our only night in a hotel. The next day we were planning to drive all the way through to Big Sandy.

We woke up early the next morning and got on the road. Most of the second day was relatively uneventful. We carried lots of oil and kept the acceleration easy at speeds over 50 and things seemed to go OK. Until mid afternoon, my son was driving and we were starting up the hill out of Helena when the truck could not get above 30 miles per hour. Frustrated and worried that we were not going to make Big Sandy that night, we pulled to the side to see what we could do. We had towing available thanks to the preparations made by my wife. I called a knowledgeable buddy and we talked through carburetor adjustment. I did as advised and the truck fired up and seemed to run well enough again.


By the time we got to Great Falls it was acting up again. I decided that it would be better to stop for the night in Great Falls, either get someone to look at it or get more serious about fixing the problem ourselves, and then drive through to Big Sandy the next day. Fortunately we had no problem finding a hotel. We drove to the hotel and spend a good couple of hours talking,laughing and relaxing. It had been a stressful couple of days. At this point I realized that the problem we were experiencing with the truck was the same behavior I had experienced with a 1973 VW Bus I had. The problem that time was clogged fuel filters. Then I realized that there were no filters on the fuel line. Anywhere. OK. So, now I have a plan. I called O’Reilly Auto Parts in Great Falls. They had a fuel pump and a fuel filters in stock. And, they would let us work on the truck in their parking lot just like on Roadkill.

The next morning we had a lovely breakfast before driving over to O’Reilly. We bought a fuel pump, an inline fuel filter, a replacement filter to go in the carb and the necessary extra parts to put it all together. We also bought new plugs to replace the oil fouled ones that now had about 700 miles on them. We had everything replaced and the carb adjusted in about 90 minutes. Then the moment of truth. We climbed in and started down the road toward Big Sandy. We got to the first stretch of highway and opened it up. No hesitations, just good strong acceleration. We pulled into Big Sandy and the ranch in time for lunch. My son got very little time to celebrate the victory of his first Roadkill road trip (we didn’t fail). He was put to work right after lunch.

Rusty Bullet in Big Sandy, MT

At the end of his time in Big Sandy, my son jumped in the truck to head home. The truck made it about 250 miles before the rings finally gave out completely. In true Roadkill fashion, the Rusty Bullet now sits at a friend’s ranch. My son rode the Greyhound bus home. He is now rebuilding an engine that we will haul out to Dillon, Montana. We will do an engine swap in the pasture and drive the Rusty Bullet home next summer. Because that, is the Roadkill way.

And no, the truck was not able to do burn outs. We plan to fix that with the new engine.

This year my annual pilgrimage to Montana involves attending the Montana Stockgrowers Association (MSGA) mid year meeting. This came about largely at the suggestion of Walker Milhoan, an acquaintance that I met through Twitter. I am hoping to get a chance to sit down with him for a few minutes and talk about the future of technology in ranching. I also hope to meet and chat with Ryan Goodman, Manager of Communications at MSGA.

I have had long running discussions with both of these men about the use of smartphones, computers, and technology in general in the ranching industry. While the farming industry has been adopting various technologies pretty readily for the past 10 to 15 years, ranching has been more resistive. Recent developments such as smartphones, cloud computing, and technologies associated with drones are making technology a lot more accessible to the rancher as well as providing significantly more benefit.

I am looking forward to meeting MSGA members and finding out how much of a role technology plays on their ranches today. I would like to help ranchers better incorporate the resources that are available online and through the use of computers to improve production and profitability.

When I first started blogging I built my web site on Moveable Type. After a couple of false starts I finally joined the rest of the blogosphere on WordPress. I have been nagging @n33co (aka AJ) to finish the WordPress templates he is working on that match his outstanding html5 site templates. AJ suggested that I could wait until he has time to finish his WordPress templates or I could try Jekyll, a static site generator (SSG). Jekyll looked like more work to set up than I was willing to do. Further investigation led me to Hugo. Hugo looked so simple I decided to give it a try.

Hugo claims to make web sites fun again, shifting the focus away from convoluted configuration of complex content management systems, back to html, css and the creation of content. Installing Hugo on my Kubuntu 14.10 laptop took less than 10 minutes. Getting to the place where I was learning how Hugo worked took another 5 minutes. So far it has been very simple, very fast, and very light weight.

I have been using Hugo for an hour or so. I like the simplicity; I like the idea of being able to produce my entire web site, blog included, using only basic tools instead of a complex php/perl based web application. The Hugo engine resides on my computer. The only thing that needs to live on the web host is the html, css, and javascript that drives the site. The resulting web site is extremely fast, regardless of the device being used to access it.

Next I am looking forward to incorporating Hugo into AJ’s miniport web site template which will finally bring my blog into the same design as the rest of

[The Hugo site is here.]

What would you do with a million dollars? How much is a million dollars? If you have a million dollars, can you quit your day job?

Back in 1999 I was working at Microsoft. I had received an offer from Apple. Quite a few people were shocked that I would even consider leaving Microsoft, especially to take a job at Apple. Everyone knew Apple’s days were numbered. What I heard often was, “if you just stay at Microsoft until you’re fully vested, you will be a millionaire. Then you can work wherever you want, you won’t have to worry about money.” I talked to several Microsoft millionaires who had done what everyone was suggesting I do. They gave me pretty much the same advice. In order to live on investment returns you should plan on a 5% return rate. So, you need to have enough invested that you can live on a 5% annual return. Under this theory, one million dollars would yield an annual salary of $50,000. I have no idea whether the particulars are accurate but the general concept is interesting.

Lotto jackpots are a favorite seed for daydreams. What would you do with five hundred million dollars? Most daydreams focus on how to spend that money. Cars, boats, yachts, ships, houses, city blocks, islands. What could you buy with that much money. After my experience in thinking about leaving Microsoft, my thought process changed. I realized that five hundred million dollars invested wisely and conservatively would mean that the next two, maybe three generations of my family would never have to work to make a living. Using the formula the Microsoft millionaires gave me, five hundred million dollars would yield twenty five million dollars a year. That is six and a quarter million per year per immediate family member. If we could manage a modicum of frugality and live on only one million dollars a year, the invested base would continue to grow such that it is reasonable to assume my grandchildren and, quite probably my great grandchildren would never work for a living.

I some times post the question on Facebook; “What would you do with LatestJackpotValue dollars?” Someone proposed a very interesting answer. He would use a relatively small part of it to take care of himself and his family. Then, he would give away $250,000 to a perfect stranger every week until the money ran out. The amount in question, after he had taken care of his own, was one hundred million dollars. Again, using the Microsoft millionaire formula, if my friend restricted himself to giving away $250,000 twenty weeks a year, basically every other week, he would be able to give away money for the rest of his life without ever touching the initial one hundred million.

About a month ago I finally began in earnest on one of my dreams. After a lot of searching, I bought a 1963 Chevrolet C10 truck. I have wanted an old truck to work on and drive for years. For many years, it simply wasn’t practical. I’m finally reaching a point in my life where I can afford to be less practical and realize a few more dreams.

The Chevy C10 is a long bed, still wearing what is left of its original cameo white over turquoise crystal. The paint is tired and has seen better days but it also qualifies as a ‘patina’ that seems to be in vogue of late. The truck has the original wood bed with the wood still in excellent condition. There does not appear to have ever been any significant body damage. There is a repairable dent to the front left fender. The rear suspension is trailing arm with coil springs which makes it ride like a car. Not great for hauling heavy loads or towing things but excellent for a vehicle whose primary purpose is daily driver.

The truck originally had a 230 CID inline 6 engine connected to a column shifted, 3 speed transmission. At some point the 230 was replaced with a 1976 250 CID 6 cylinder. The truck ran well enough to drive it the 125 miles home but there was plenty of work to be done. It leaked a lot of oil. The carburetor badly needed to be rebuilt. The shocks are probably the factory originals from 1963. The truck rides like my first ship. I had the opportunity to buy a very similar Ford F-100 that was pretty much done for about the same price. I am not sure how I will feel in a couple of months but right now I prefer this diamond in the rough that needs work. When it is ‘done’ (we all know project vehicles like this are never done) it will be my work of art. I will have the satisfaction of knowing that I am responsible for how it looks and runs.

The first thing I tackled was the seals and gaskets. Valve cover gasket, push rod cover gaskets and we tried to replace the oil pan gasket but discovered that requires at least lifting the engine off its mounts. We were not quite ready to do that. The drips from the truck when it is parked are less but not gone. No drips ever is important to me so, I need to find the other leaks.

Next on the list we tackled the carburetor. The truck has a Rochester B manual choke carburetor. I purchased a carburetor rebuild kit from Mike’s Carburetor Parts. We bought a can of Berryman Chem-Dip carburetor cleaner. We removed the carb from the truck and began to tear it down. There are a lot of little parts in a carburetor. The Rochester B is a pretty simple carb, definitely one of the easier ones to rebuild. We were pretty happy for that. It will be a while before I am really to take on the challenge of rebuilding a Holley four barrel.

The truck now gets 12 and half miles to the gallon. The filler neck on the gas tank leaks so about a half gallon to a gallon of gas goes on the floor every time I fill up. The gas tank is currently out so that I can replace the filler neck. While the gas tank is out I am also dealing with the rust on the floorboard. Nothing cancerous but some pretty severe pitting. I wirebrushed in all out. I will treat the areas that were rusty and then put a couple of coats of paint down. Over that I plan to put sound deadening material over the painted surfaces. My goal is to make the truck quieter than my wife’s new Nissan. I have a cool stereo system designed for it but first I have to make sure I will be able to hear it.


It is interesting to watch the national discussion to define marriage. What is marriage? What does it mean in the greater context of society? Who defines it? Is it really just Going Steady for grown ups? If there is more to it than that, where does it come from? The answers to these questions depend heavily on your worldview. Marriage might mean one husband with up to four wives, one wife with several husbands, one husband with one wife, or two husbands or two wives, or something else.

In recent years the Christian worldview has come into question here in the US. This comes largely out of the push to legalize same sex marriage. I enjoy these challenges to my own beliefs. They force me to re-evaluate my own worldview. Keeping my own worldview logically consistent, at least in my own head, is important. At least to me.

What follows is an articulation of what I believe. I am putting it out there because it might be interesting or useful to someone else. I have no desire to force my view on anyone. That you do not agree with me presents no significant issue for me. I am wrong a lot. I am OK with that.

I subscribe to the Christian worldview. Therefore, my concept of marriage is derived from my understanding of Christian precepts. Your mileage will vary depending on your feelings about Christianity. That too, is fine.

The Christian concept of marriage is an integral part of God having created man in His image and goes all the way back to Genesis. “Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image…” (Gen 1:26) We start from the trinity. Inherent in the image of God is relationship because God is three persons. Without relationship, you simply do not have an image of God. Any singular identity cannot be the image of God because God has for eternity been in relationship; Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The image of God requires relationship.

If God created man in His image, which is the image of God? Man or Woman? This seems like an issue. It was a curious question for me until I was listening to Stuart MacAllister on an RZIM podcast. It was actually a something of a quip, an aside that he made. MacAllister said, “What if man and woman are both God’s image, two sides of the same coin.” This was a huge ah hah! moment for me. Not all at once. I spent a couple of weeks working through what that meant. I am probably still working on it. But suddenly, marriage and a lot of the things they say about marriage began to make sense.

Man is only half of the image of God, woman is required to complete that image. The image of God in the Christian worldview is one man and one woman in a committed relationship for life, as God is in relationship for eternity. According to this view, two men in relationship is not the image of God in that it is missing the components that only a woman can bring to the relationship. Likewise, two women.

A man and a woman entering into a relationship, forsaking all others, building trust that comes from year after year of knowing that person is still committed only to you, remaining in relationship for their entire lives, until death does part them is a reasonable, human illustration, of the image of God. An imperfect image, to be sure.

We aren’t living up to this worldview very well, given the prominence of divorce in America. Even those who claim to hold a Christian worldview some times treat marriage a lot like Going Steady in high school. However, that does not diminish the standard set forth. The best example of the trinity in human experience is a man and a woman in a committed relationship, forsaking all others and becoming, ‘one flesh’.

I can see pitch forks, torches and rocks out there. This describes what I believe to be a Biblical view of marriage. As a Christian, I hold this view. However, I also understand that anyone who does not share my worldview is very likely to have a different view of marriage. It might be only slightly different or it might be radically different. There are some even within the Christian worldview who will not agree with what I have described here. The challenge in any society is working out how to integrate disparate worldviews into a peaceful coexistence. American society is in the throes of working out exactly what ‘marriage’ means.

One of the GOP’s main talking points this election season is repealing Obamacare. The real point of that is to keep Obamacare at the fore since the American public is still unconvinced that it is a good thing. In general, I agree that Obamacare is not a viable, long term solution in its current form. One way or another, I think the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will morph into something else. However, I do not think the GOP will be successful in repealing the ACA and if they are successful I do not think the action would be popular.

I am a life long registered GOP voter. I do not always agree with the party but it most closely represents my political views. If the GOP is serious about repealing ACA they first need to explain what they will replace it with. What does the GOP healthcare reform look like? The DNC did a good job of squelching GOP proposals and even GOP participation in the healthcare debate during the 2008 – 2010 time frame when ACA was developed and finally passed. I think most voters believe that the GOP had no alternatives proposals. This is untrue. The GOP was making proposals, they just weren’t very effective at getting their story out, which is a long standing problem for the GOP.

The proposal I still prefer had three main components; decouple healthcare from employers, allow insurance providers to operate at the national level instead of the state level, implement meaningful tort reform. To this I would add one more important component; an assigned risk pool for those deemed un-insurable.

Insofar as I can determine health insurance as an employment benefit started during World War II when wage caps prevented employers from offering ever higher wages. Health insurance coverage became allowed as a form of compensation to attract workers. Today, health care coverage being attached to one’s employer makes no logical sense. Moreover, the arrangement skews the market in a direction that puts the individual at a disadvantage.

Because health insurance is currently obtained primarily through one’s employer, heath insurance companies spend the bulk of their effort developing products aimed at winning medium and large companies because this is where the biggest profit is made. Health insurance products for individuals and small companies require significantly more effort to sell and offer a significantly smaller profit margin.

Decoupling health insurance from employment is simply a matter of taxing health insurance contributions made by the employer as income to the individual. This will force health insurance providers to focus on developing products for and selling to individuals rather than corporations. The individual consumer gains direct control over their health care options rather than being forced to choose from whatever list of options their current employer decided to provide. The health care provider is motivated to develop better products for the individual and family because this becomes their primary means of delivering their product.

Removing state boundaries allowing health insurance companies to operate nationwide greatly broadens the pool of insured. All but the smallest health insurance companies already operate nation wide. Eliminating the state boundary requirements would simply allow them to do so more efficiently. Some states would benefit from increased competition.

Tort reform would be a real attempt to reduce health care costs. Much of the increasing cost in health care is related to minimizing exposure to malpractice suits, either through higher malpractice coverage or by ordering a myriad of tests primarily for the purpose of protecting the practice against law suits. Tort reform would very probably also be the most difficult piece of the proposal. Tort lawyers are politically well organized, well funded, and very active in lobbying.

The component not on the GOP proposal but which I think is critical is an assigned risk pool. In my mind, this would work similar to auto insurance assigned risk. Individuals who have medical conditions that warrant it are put in the assigned risk pool. In the case of auto insurance assigned risk carries a high cost as a penalty for being a bad driver. Since medical conditions seldom if ever warrant punitive measures, assigned risk health insurance could work exactly the opposite. Anyone in assigned risk would get health care coverage at the same price as a healthy individual with no medical issues. The assigned risk pool would be evenly distributed across all health insurance companies and participation is required. The government could help subsidize this group thereby using tax dollars to help those who need help.

I understand that people do not like ACA but let us get passed the emotional desire to punish anyone and focus on making a better health care system in this country. If the issue is providing top quality health care to as many citizens as possible, let us focus on that. Not on whose plan we are using or who gets the credit or the blame.

The GOP could implement each of these components without the drama and backlash of repealing ACA. Either as a package or as individual items. The GOP could bill it as their contribution to improving ACA which would go to demonstrating their willingness to find common ground and cooperate.

How does the GOP plan to solve the problems that ACA is attempting to solve? I understand that the GOP does not think ACA is a good solution. I even agree that it is not a good solution. However, ACA has made things better for my family. My son, who has a pre-existing condition and cannot get health care coverage on his own, benefits from ACA. The GOP should focus on convincing American voters that it can make health care in America better. Better than it is now, better than what ACA is offering. The GOP tells me they want to repeal ACA but they are silent when I ask what they plan to replace it with.

The annual one week reminder of what I really want in life.


My son and I went down to Dryhead Ranch, based in Wyoming for branding week. I love being on a ranch. I love doing cattle work. Still, this is the best Tom Sawyer deal ever. I pay a lot of money to go do someone else’s work. It is possible that they could do the work faster without guests “helping” but Tom would still be proud.

We arrived Sunday evening in time for dinner after driving for two days across California, Nevada, parts of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Monday we gathered the cow/calf pairs and then sorted out the pairs in which the calf needed branding. We moved the sorted group to a lower pasture so they would be easy to pull down into the branding corral.

Tuesday we rode out to the pasture to gather and move the sorted pairs down into the branding corral. We had 49 calves that would get branded, ear notched, banded for castration, a 7 way vaccination and a black leg vaccination. Not a great day for the calves. “Mom, look what they did to me!”


A rider will lasso the hind legs of a calf and drag it to the stove. An attempt is made to catch it in the Nord Fork. If this works, getting everything done is pretty quick. About half the time the Nord Fork does not catch and calf must be wrestled down by the mugger. Once the calf is down each person moves in for their assigned task; ear notching, 7 way vaccination, black leg vaccination, castration band for bull calves, and branding. If the Nord Fork caught, it takes about 3 minutes. If the calf is held by a mugger, it takes about 5 minutes. Once everything is done, the calf is released. One minute after the calf is released, it is impossible to tell by behavior which calves have been branded and which have not. The calf is reunited with its mother who checks it out carefully to make sure the calf is OK.

Branding is often a big social event in ranching life. Friends are invited to help and once the work is done, there is a big feast to celebrate the beginning of another year. Branding usually marks the end of calving season and the beginning of growing the cattle to ready them for market. A little like the celebrations that happen in farming communities once planting is complete.

This year was different in that the Smith women did not come along. Dryhead Ranch is more secluded and offered little in the way of shopping or sight seeing. So, the girls stayed home. My son and I got an opportunity to ‘bond’ and celebrate that father/son thing.

On Tuesday, Yoshi and I worked together wrestling calves. I really enjoyed working with my son. Which only further reinforces my desire to make a life change into a ranching community. On Thursday, Yoshi was out sick, which was a disappointment. He and I got to ride together on Monday, Tuesday and Friday. I was sick Wednesday, he was sick Thursday. The big drawback of the trip. Getting sick. Not fun.

Until I live in Montana/Wyoming/Dakota, I am sure that I will continue to pay Tom a precious price for the opportunity to do his work for him.